8/10/ · Bioethics: Raising Questions About the Adverse Impact of Advances in Biology and Medicine Essay Bioethics is the study of typically controversial ethics brought about by advances in biology and medicine 29/1/ · Bioethics Paper Example. There are many complex issues regarding confidentiality and the right to privacy in the modern health care system. It is the duty of physicians, nurses, and others to maintain classified information about their patients’ private health unless they agree to 1/12/ · Bioethics: Definition, Cloning, Food, and Organs Pages: 6 ( words) Ethics conclusion Pages: 2 ( words) Argumentative Essay Topics About Animals Pages: 2 ( words) Bioethics: Abortion Sample Pages: 5 ( words)Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins
Good Bioethics Essays | WOW Essays
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it. Type of paper: Essay. Topic: GovernmentMedicineChildrenBioethics essaybioethics essay, FamilyGeneticsHumanAutonomy. Genetic abnormalities that relate to gender, otherwise known as anatomical sexual variation, are part of human intersexuality, bioethics essay. Intersex is defined as the anatomical variation from the standard male or female gender, and is a pathological variable that require medical treatment.
This means that an intersex child bioethics essay the sexual anatomy of both genders. Intersex genitals may therefore be a sign of an underlying medical condition, but they are not a medical problem. The notion that normalizing intersex genitalia is the corrective treatment path is biased and not justified for individual anatomy.
It violates the right and autonomy of self-determination for the intersex person. Intersex persons are entitled to the same ethical principles that apply to everyone else; autonomy, self-determination and respect for their sexual orientation. These persons and their families should bioethics essay or have access to sound information and personalized psychological treatment to help them cope with the social difficulties they may encounter.
Medical bioethics essay psychological support is vital for bioethics essay persons to guide them towards making sound health choices such as bioethics essay and or when cosmetic surgery and other treatments are necessary or advisable. Consultations, bioethics essay, genetic tests and counselling are recommend before giving ones consent, in the event of a surgery, for purposes of accountability due to the risk factors involved, bioethics essay.
Gender assignment should not be rushed since it is not reversible and it carries risks such as; loss of fertility, scarring, pain, continence and rejection of the assigned gender if it was not a consensual surgery.
For the above stated reasons, all gender assignment by parents and doctors is assumed to be preliminary, bioethics essay. The gender assigned will be based on the results of genetic testing, as well as the gender that is most likely to be accepted by the child and parents. In the past, bioethics essay, the concealment-centred treatment model assigned gender without giving parents and intersex persons all available information or alternate treatments.
However, the bioethics essay future for intersex persons advocates for social acceptance, where these individuals get to enjoy autonomy despite their sexuality. This would involve recognizing that sexual categories are sexist and socially constructed to exclude those with ambiguous genitalia. Bioethics dictates against being judgemental to such patients from a both a professional bioethics essay a social point, bioethics essay.
Such only serve to add more strain to the already existing threats to autonomy by an individual who faces such a condition. Medical experts therefore are required to offer counselling to these patients for them to be more accepting of their condition.
This is what the patient-centred treatment model is all about. The irony of the matter is that society is slowly but surely becoming more accepting of the fact that there exist several sexual orientations, yet has become increasingly critical and disapproving of bioethics essay in individuals, bioethics essay, which is a natural phenomenon.
This has placed a lot of limitations to autonomy of people who are intersexual by nature. Enhancing quality of genes in humans remains subject to research. People are mostly split between the advantages and disadvantages of such action. Although it would be amazing to have perfect humans among the population, bioethics essay, concern has been raised about the fate of the natural human species.
This has been a debate in bioethics essay public domain since the technology came into place. The principle of autonomy gives people the freedom to reproduce without assessing their level of risk to bear or competence to rear children especially with the consent of, or in consultation with their partner. Medicine has given the section of the society that cannot bear their own children a chance to do so through Assisted Reproductive Technologies ARTs.
ARTs have been as controversial as expected, bioethics essay, with people initially not supportive of the fact that individuals could use an unnatural way of having children, yet have healthy children.
Matters were further complicated by the question of ownership of the embryo and its status after the child had been born. It is matters such as these that have brought about grave ethical concerns.
It is imperative to note that this development in technology and medicine has greatly changed the composition of the family that have traditionally been bioethics essay place. At the moment, same sex couples can have their children and have a family as normal as the conventional family. This could involve numerous medical procedures like implantation of a fertilised egg into a partner who has the capability to sustain the pregnancy, bioethics essay.
This is mostly a fully voluntary exercise. However, an issue may arise where maternal foetal conflicts begin to come about. Mothers to-be have every right to respond to maternal issues affecting them.
The final decision as to what happens to their foetuses rests entirely in their hands, bioethics essay. Bio-ethically the doctor is only meant to advice and give recommendations on procedures that could help alleviate a bad condition or avoid one of such from occurring. The patient decides the way to go and the outcome. However, the autonomy of the patient to make some of these decisions is affected by their lack of professional knowledge and experience.
This autonomy has led to more fatalities during pregnancies and child births because a patient may insist upon delivering a child with a condition which could put the mother at risk. Development in science has also granted potential parents the ability to know the genomes carried by their unborn children, raising a lot of concern about eugenic alteration and selection, which naturally should be an autonomous preference of the parent but ethically does not support or promise a positive ending.
Despite the medical profession putting safety at the top of the list, safety concerns on the issue of ARTs have been raised. There is a constant probability that the children born out of this exercise may be born with less weight or some other forms of malformations. It has therefore become reason for posing this question: Should all persons seeking ARTs be given the service without due regard to their age, sexual orientation, ability to rear a child, health status among other factors?
Ethically, it is not right to allow an individual to bear a child at the expense of the welfare of the child, whatever might be the reason for the threat on the child. The Principle of Beneficence gives doctors the power to bioethics essay what they think is best for the general wellbeing of their patients, bioethics essay. At the point where the patient may not be in a position to make bioethics essay, drastic decisions, the doctor is expected to make those decisions on their behalf.
Ensuring a patient is safe is the paramount objective of every medical procedure. This principle is what ought to guide medical professionals when they are selecting lines of action. With doctors and surgeons given the ability to make these decisions, bioethics essay, serious ethical issues arise. For instance, bioethics essay, a patient may not prefer the procedure selected by the doctor. This could be due to a number of factors important to the patient.
Such a patient has a right to refuse treatment. However, the power vested upon a doctor to decide for a patent could be abused. This concern has been validated from the numerous cases of doctors prescribing the wrong medication to patients, sometimes giving an overdose, which may lead to fatalities, bioethics essay. Kantian ethics are founded on the principle of morality. The Universal Law Formula assumes that the universal law applies to all except for oneself, bioethics essay.
This means that despite an individual breaking the law, bioethics essay, he or she expects everyone else to abide by the law. Therefore, Kantian ethics assume a person to be any being that can make and uphold moral decisions, bioethics essay.
In as much as individuals enjoy freedoms as stipulated above, the issue of organ donation is a risky venture, bioethics essay.
There are numerous medical procedures to determine issues like compatibility. This could involve unethical practices like bribery and theft of organs, therefore denying the process some credibility. It is such situations that gave credence to the establishment of both state and federal laws that govern donation of organs.
Persons on the other hand are ends. As such, they must be treated with dignity and respect, bioethics essay. Another implication of this principle is that telling a lie is wrong. The Kantian alternative to lying bioethics essay saying nothing.
This principle is seen to incline towards supporting the Principle of Autonomy, bioethics essay. This creates a thin line between ethical and unethical methods of organ acquisition, bioethics essay. On the matter of organ donation, the Kantian position is that it is wrong and inappropriate, bioethics essay.
This is because the human body has an intrinsic value; organ donation, especially in the presence of financial incentives implies an instrumental value imposed on parts of the body.
In addition, the question of exploitation as of when it should be morally approved or otherwise arises. Bioethics essay moral point bioethics essay concern is that by commercializing the sale of organs, greed will eventually come into play thereby making organ sale intrinsically evil, the issue being procurement procedures and methods, bioethics essay. Kant does not support assisted reproduction.
This is from the position that he took on donation of body organs. He believes that assisted reproduction gives rise to a generation of human beings of inferior quality that could radically change bioethics essay quality of human beings and the ability of the human race to actively produce viable offspring over time.
The utilitarian approach states that an action that is morally right, or one that we are morally obliged to will be the most beneficial to everyone. It would maximise utility thus have more benefits than any other task at hand. This however raises the question of consequences. An action that will produce the bioethics essay utility may not necessarily the most morally upright.
Therefore, individual rights outweigh social utility maximization. The benefits are such as the donated organs will provide resources for advancing research. Legalizing organ sale will cater to the organ shortages through providing due process in matters concerning the sale and purchase bioethics essay organs, thereby eliminating the need for the black-market, which does not guarantee the quality of the organ. In this regard, many life threatening situations can be mitigated. It is in light of this that strict guidelines that balance all the above approaches come into play.
It is essential to ensure that the entire process of organ donation is above board to avert crises caused by human ambition. The Principle of Autonomy or self-determination is at the core of the debate to legalize euthanasia. To be forced by law to live an intolerable life, when one would prefer to choose death, or when doctors are willing to assist bioethics essay end his or her own life, violates individual autonomy.
It is the ability to choose whether or not these personal values remain the same while making the bold decision of whether to live or die. Clarity in distinguishing legal circumstances is based on whether the right to self-determination is negative or positive. In the positive right, the duty to euthanize is imposed on someone while the negative right does not give one any entitlement to demand euthanasia.
Legalization thus implies that it is legal to perform euthanasia on a person who meets the qualification criteria, but it is not obligatory to comply with the said request. For this reason, euthanasia is an option confined for the dying, but not those who are suffering without the risk of dying.
How to Write an Ethics Paper
, time: 10:58Bioethics Essay | Bartleby
31/3/ · Read Our Essays About Bioethics and other exceptional papers on every subject and topic college can throw at you. We can custom-write anything as well! We use cookies to enhance our website for blogger.comted Reading Time: 11 mins “Bioethics” has been used in the last twenty years to describe a study of ways in which decisions in medicine and science touch our health, lives, as well our society, and environment. Bioethics is concerned with questions about basic human values such as the rights to life and health, and the rightness or wrongness of certain developments in healthcare BioEthics Essay example Ethical Challenges In Nursing: Bioethics And Nursing. Bioethics and Nursing In this age of advanced technology where Bioethics in Medicine, Exemplified by the Karen Ann Quinlan Case. It is accepted that the advances
No comments:
Post a Comment